Methodology • Protocol

Evaluation Study Mini‑Protocol

A compact, thesis-ready protocol for evaluating Flexible Thinking outcomes using log evidence, reflections, and an inline rubric.

Page image
Research design

Purpose & research questions

This protocol evaluates whether a TEL environment designed with Design Thinking scaffolds can produce measurable traces of Flexible Thinking (FT).

RQ1 — Decision flexibility
Do learners switch strategies when evidence contradicts the initial hypothesis?
RQ2 — Evidence-based justification
Do learners justify choices using concrete evidence (logs, sources, observations) rather than intuition?
RQ3 — Transfer & reflection
Can learners articulate what transfers to new contexts and propose a Plan B?

Participants
  • Target group: higher‑education learners in TEL / computing / digital pedagogy (or teacher‑training cohorts).
  • Suggested sample size: 8–20 participants for a pilot (thesis‑level feasibility study).
  • Prerequisites: basic ability to interpret simple logs + reflect on decisions.
Procedure (45–60 minutes)
Phase Task Captured evidence
Warm‑up Read the FT rubric criteria + success indicators. Baseline rubric entry (optional).
Module 1 Complete one branching incident (2–3 decision points). Path choices, hint usage, reflections, time stamps.
Module 2 Write prompt v1→v3, critique outputs, add a fact‑check source. Prompt versions, checklist, source panel, reflection.
Module 3 Submit evidence + 2 interpretations, peer review another submission. Evidence list, alternatives map, peer review scores, transfer statement.
Debrief Self‑score using the inline rubric (all modules). Rubric entries + justification text.

Measures & analysis
  • Log metrics: decision paths, strategy switches, hint ladder levels, time on task.
  • Rubric scoring: 1–4 per FT criterion with brief justification.
  • Reflection quality: claim→evidence→alternative→limitation structure (qualitative coding).
  • Peer review: clarity/evidence/alternatives/transfer ratings + comments.
Live dataset (this browser)

What has been captured so far

Runs (all modules)
pie
Rubric entries
radar

Ethics & data protection
This demo is local‑first. Evidence is stored in the browser (localStorage) and exported manually. No server tracking is enabled. For formal studies: obtain informed consent, avoid sensitive personal data, and anonymize exports.
Exports